A precise, descriptive read on your facial proportions — mapped from landmarks into 37 measurements, each compared to published anthropometric ranges and located on your own photo. What your features are, and what you can shape. In seconds.
Exactly what you get — measured on real sample photos through the same pipeline your photo would use. A description of the features, not a rating. Switch between people to see how it reads different faces.
25 of 37 proportions sit within the typical range — a description of Woman 1's features, not a rating.
Below are 6 of the 37 measurements we run on every face — frontal proportions and profile angles, each located on the real photo and compared to cited research.
See Woman 1's full report — all 37 metrics →The model that powers our analysis was tested on thousands of faces that large groups of people had already rated — photos it never saw in training — to confirm it reads faces the way people do. Your report is descriptive: it shows your proportions, not a ranking against others.
the engine's agreement with human raters, on faces it had never seen
Benchmarked on a public research dataset of human-rated faces.
Checked on a balanced set so it stays consistent for everyone — not tuned to one population.
Every number, chart and method is published — see exactly how we validated it.
One clear, front-facing photo — or use your camera. Takes seconds, no account needed.
Google's MediaPipe mesh locates 478 facial points, corrects for head tilt, and measures the proportions.
A plain-language read of your face plus a metric-by-metric breakdown of your proportions — each with its source, what it means, and the everyday levers you can actually shape.
Most "face raters" score you against the golden ratio — a convention modern research has largely debunked. We measure your real proportions instead, and make every number transparent and sourced.
The model behind our analysis was validated on large datasets of faces that thousands of people had rated — on photos it had never seen, it reads faces the way people do about 88% of the time, versus a coin-flip 50%. Your report itself stays descriptive: it shows your proportions, not a rating.
See the evidence, with a fairness check across ethnicities →We locate 478 landmarks, correct for head tilt, and derive 37 proportion and angle measurements — each compared to cited anthropometric research, not folklore.
We test the score on faces balanced across seven ethnic groups so it stays consistent for everyone — not tuned to one population.
Every metric has a definition, a source, and an honest caveat where the science is debated — and the engine's accuracy is published in full. No black box.
The internet is full of "looksmaxxing" scores pulled from a Renaissance ratio. Here's how an honest, measured approach is different.
Your report is a transparent, landmark-by-landmark description of your face: proportions, distances and angles measured from the 478-point mesh, each compared to published ranges and shown with its source. No skin, colour or dental guesses — just geometry, honestly.
Breakdown grounded in: Farkas 1994, Farkas et al. 1985, Rhodes et al. 1998, Naini 2011. Full citations appear with each unlocked metric.
Comparable analyses run $49–$150. 30-day money-back guarantee.
One clear, front-facing photo with even lighting, a neutral expression, and your face unobstructed (hair off the forehead helps). A straight-on angle gives the most accurate proportions; add a side photo to unlock the profile angles. It takes seconds and needs no account.
Free read + preview · full report $9 one-time · 30-day money-back guarantee
